Fr Alexander is one of the best kept "secrets" of Modern Orthodox academics. He has done a ton of great work. These two pdfs are just more evidence of the penetrating mind of Fr Alexander. What I like best is the grappling with the Old Covenant, a topic not much discussed in contemporary Orthodox publications.
Liturgy and Mysticism: The Experience of God in Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Part I
Liturgy and Mysticism: The Experience of God in Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Part II
See more here at the Jewish Roots of Eastern Christian Mysticism seminar @ Marquette.Matt Millinerd writes an informative post.
Attempts to overcome metaphysics having been shown to be themselves irrepressibly metaphysical, metaphysics is again in the air. Consider Dan Siedell's compelling review of Gabriel Bunge's The Rublev Trinity. Siedell quotes philosopher Jean-Luc Marion's Crossing the Visible, where he suggests that Nicaea II, the council that vindicated icons, "formulates above all and—perhaps the only—alternative to the contemporary disaster of the image." Siedell then takes the philosopher's insight into firm art historical terrain: "The icon is the theological foundation of all painting, secular and religious." We can hope any who missed this crucial insight from Sidell's God in the Gallery will get it this time around.
The fiercely brilliant (and if you doubt that adjectival combination, read the last paragraph of this review) art critic Maureen Mullarkey provides a remarkable testimony to just such an insight. After years of hesitation, and despite extensive experience in New York both reviewing and creating contemporary art, Mullarkey has come around to seeing the wisdom of the Byzantine aesthetic. Spend a considerable amount of time not just reading Patristics, but marinating in the Orthodox liturgy, and you'll likely agree.
What does this have to do with metaphysics? Everything. Interest in the icon is not just for those who like painting. The wisdom of Byzantine art was not in its style but in the iconic, symbolic horizon to which that style successfully testified. Fruitful as the icon may be for painters and art historians, it would be a mistake, one almost laughable in its small-mindedness, to limit the Byzantine iconic perspective to the realm of "art". Consider a not so familiar passage of John of Damascus:
We see images in creation which faintly reveal to us the reflections of God, as when, for instance we speak of the Holy and eternal Trinity imaged by the sun, or light, or a ray, or by a spurting fountain, or a gushing stream, or a river, or by the mind, or speech, or the spirit within us, or by a rose bush, or a flower, or a sweet fragrance (De imaginibus oratio I).No narrow "art theory" there. Icons are merely the fish that swim in that ocean. (An ocean, incidentally, in which the Protestant Jonathan Edwards swims just as happily.) The word for that ocean, following Aristotle, is "metaphysics." Like all words that have been around for a while, it's been abused and misused, but it's eminently recoverable. Abusus non tollit usum.
The thing that Siedell is after, that Mullarkey intuitively grasps, and that Damascus and Edwards effortlessly understood, is a thick metaphysical horizon. Make no mistake, the word is getting out on this. In the latest Mars Hill Audio journal, Ken Meyers interviewed Stratford Caldecott, James Matthew Wilson and Thomas Hibbs to discuss the kind of realism that can sustain such metaphysical grit. I highly recommend shelling out the few bucks to listen in, but the same idea is on offer, at considerable length, in one of Wilson's essays, entitled Saint Augustine and the Meaning of Art. Even if symbolism and meaning have been systematically eviscerated thanks to a fashionable academic cyclone that has long since passed, there is nothing about such a turn of events that prevents the immediate recovery of the previous symbolic arrangement. In Wilson's memorable words:
The meaning of the world that we usually describe as constituting culture, or a culture... does not depend primarily upon our social conventions. Rather, the signs of a culture are founded on natural signs, and, indeed, are themselves natural signs in whose fashioning our intellects cooperate, and for whose knowledge and joy they exist. Given how destructive the wars and social changes of the last century have been—above all the change in thought that has tried to reduce even the human person to a fungible fact for exploitation—we should take great comfort in that fact. The meaning of things, which our cultures may embrace and develop, nonetheless does not depend on us for their existence. And so, when we see a painting or some other work of art—the remnants, say, of some half-ruined memorial statue, in some empty square, at the edge of a red-light district in Brussels—we are seeing not the illegible signs of a lost culture. We are seeing a sign whose meaning has, for the moment, been lost to us, and whose intelligibility only awaits someone with reason, sense, and patience enough to uncover it.Call them Neo-Byzantine, Edwardsian or Maritanian, there seem to be an increasing number of such someones. But - and this is Wilson's point - it wouldn't even matter if there were not.
The recluse is humanity’s delegate to what is important.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 226
- Peter Porter
It seems that the Volos Conference has been underway and overviews of the specific papers have been provided via the website for the Volos Academy.
Here is a general outline:
Holy
Metropolis of Demetrias
INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE
Neo-Patristic Synthesis or
Post-Patristic
Theology: Can Orthodox Theology be Contextual?
June 3-6, 2010, THESSALIA
CONFERENCE CENTER,
(MELISSIATIKA), VOLOS
The
conference is organized
in collaboration with the Orthodox
Christian Studies Program of Fordham University, the Chair of
Orthodox Theology of Münster University, and the Romanian
Institute for Inter-Orthodox,
Inter–Confessional, and Inter-Religious Studies (INTER) Cluj-Napoca
PROGRAMME
THURSDAY, JUNE
3rd 2010
18.00-18.30 Registration
18.30-19.00
Opening – Greetings
Session
I
Moderator:
Dr. Pantelis Kalaitzidis
Director
of the
19.00-19.30 Rev.
Dr. Vladan
Pericic, Professor of Patrology, former Dean of the Theological Faculty,
Liturgical
Theology as Contextual Theology in the Patristic Era and Today
19.30-20.00 Dr.
George
Martzelos, Professor at the
The Role of Contextual
Theology in the Orthodox Tradition
20.00-30 Discussion
20.30 Dinner
FRIDAY
JUNE 4th 2010
Session
II
Moderator: Dr. George Demacopoulos
Associate
Professor
of Theology, Co-Founding Director,
Orthodox
Christian
Studies Program of
09.00-09.30 Dr.
Marcus
Plested, Director of Studies, Institute for Orthodox Christian Studies,
The Emergence of
the Neo-Patristic Synthesis: Content, Challenges and Limits
Florovsky’s Christian Hellenism: A Critical Evaluation
10.00-10.30 Rev.
Dr. John
Behr, Dean, St. Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological
Going Beyond Neo-Patristic Synthesis
10.30-11.30 Discussion
11.30-12.00 Coffee-break
Session III
Moderator:
Dr. Bruce Beck,
Director,
Pappas Patristic
Institute,
12.00-12.30 Archbishop
Dr. Hilarion Alfeyev of Volokolamsk, Chairman of the
Moscow Patriarchate Department for
Orthodox
Tradition and Contextual Theology
12.30-13.00 Dr.
Tamara
Grdzelidze, Programme Executive, Faith and Order, WCC
Contextualisation of the Church Fathers
in the Context of Ecumenism
13.00-13.30 Discussion
13.30-15.00 Lunch
Session IV
Moderator:
Dr. Tamara Grdzelidze
Programme
Executive, Faith
and Order, WCC
15.00-15.30 Dr.
Daniel Ayuch,
Associate Professor, St. John of Damascus Orthodox Theological Institute
of
University of Balamand, Lebanon
The Relationship
between Biblical and Theological Disciplines
15.30-16.00 Dr.
John
Fotopoulos, Associate Professor, Department of Religious Studies, Saint
Mary's
College at Notre Dame, USA
Orthodox
Theology and the Historical-Critical Method
16.00-16.30
Discussion
16.30-17.00
Coffee-break
Session V
Moderator:
Serbian
Orthodox Church,
Professor
at the
17.00-17.30
Dr.
George
Demacopoulos, Associate Professor of Theology, Co-Founding Director,
Orthodox
Christian Studies Program of
History,
Post-Colonial Theory, and Some New Possibilities for Retrieving the
Theological
Past
17.30-18.00
Alexei V.
Nesteruk, Senior Lecturer, Department
of Mathematics, University of
Portsmouth, UK; Visiting Professor, St. Andrew’s Biblical Theological
Institute, Moscow, Russia
Orthodoxy in the
Scientific Age: From a Neo-Patristic Synthesis to Radical Theological
Commitment
18.00-18.30
Rev. Dr.
Demetrios Bathrellos, Visiting Lecturer, Institute for Orthodox
Christian
Studies, Cambridge, UK; Priest of the
Aghia Sophia Greek Orthodox Church, Drafi, Attica, Greece
Systematic
Theology as a New Form of Orthodox Theology
18.30-19.30
Discussion
SATURDAY JUNE 5th 2009
Session VI
Moderator: Dr Demetrios
Moschos
Lecturer
at the Scholl of Theology,
09.00-09.30 Dr.
Assaad Elias
Kattan, Director of the
Essentialism
Reconsidered: The Myth of a Non-Hermeneutical Approach to Orthodox
Tradition
09.30-10.00 Rev.
Dr. John
Panteleimon Manoussakis, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, College of
Holy
Cross, Worcester, USA
God. Being and
Event: The Intersection between Theology and Ontology
10.00-10.30 Discussion
10.30-11.00 Coffee-break
Session VII
Moderator: Dr.
Aristotle Papanikolaou
Associate
Professor of Theology, Co-Founding Director,
Orthodox
Christian Studies Program of
(Metropolitan John Zizioulas, Dr. Aristotle Papanikolaou, Fr Andrew Louth)
11.00-11.30 Metropolitan
John
Zizioulas, Member of the
Actuality
and Temporality of the Neo-Patristic Synthesis
11.30-12.00
Fr. Andrew Louth, Professor of Patrology,
The Authority of
the Fathers in “post-patristic Orthodox theology”
12.00-12.30 Discussion
12.30-14.00 Lunch
Session VIII
Moderator: Dr Vassilios
Makrides
Professor
of Sociology of Orthodox Christianity at
14.00-14.30 Dr.
Michail
Neamtu, Senior Fellow of CADI/
Ethno-theology
as a Particular Case of Contextual Theology
14.30-15.00 Dr.
Radu Preda,
Associate Professor of Social Theology, Babes-Bolai-University,
Orthodox Social
Theology as Contextual Theology
15.00-15.30
Dr. Aristotle Papanikolaou, Associate Professor
of
Theology, Co-Founding Director, Orthodox Christian Studies Program of
Orthodox
Liberalism: Political Theology after the Empires
15.30-16.30 Discussion
16.30-17.00 Coffee-break
Session IX
Moderator: Dr.
Radu Preda
Associate
Professor, Babes-Bolai-University,
Director
of the INTER (
17.00-17.30 Dr.
Peter
Bouteneff, Associate Professor, St Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological
Seminary, New
York, USA
Liberation Theologies:
Challenges for Contemporary Orthodoxy from Contextual Theologies
17.30-18.00 Dr.
Eleni Kasselouri, Teaching at the Hellenic Open University,
Member of the
Academic Team of Volos Academy for Theological Studies, Greece
Feminist Theology and its Contextuality: A Challenge
or an
18.00-18.30 Discussion
SUNDAY JUNE 6th 2010
Divine Service at the Christ’s Ascension Church, Volos
Departure of the buses for
Session X
Moderator: Dr. Assaad Elias
Kattan
Director
of the Centre of Religious Studies
and
Chair of Orthodox Theology,
Gospel and Cultures: Toward a Theology of
Religions
12.00-12.30 Dr.
Athanasios
N. Papathanasiou, Editor in Chief of the Theological Journal
12.30-13.00 Dr.
Pantelis
Kalaitzidis, Director of the
Toward a Post-Patristic
Theology?
13.00-14.00 Discussion
14.00 End
of the
Conference-Lunch
There are press releases in English that provide over views of each day:
A blogger I have followed for some time. Fr. Gregory Edwards, has posted pictures and his impressions here
There is also a Greek website that covered the conference in great detail, here.
I enjoy the consistently beautiful pictures posted on the Athos Agion Oros blog. ESPECIALLY ones focused around the books/libraries found on Mt. Athos!
"To end day one I will show the pictures of the library of Mylopotamos. First of all I have to thank father Ioachim for taking the time to show us this special place and secondly our thanks go to Giannis, who used his influence to make this possible.
The library of Mylopotamos, Father Ioachim and pilgrim Bas
For me this visit to the library brought back memories to that special day in 1986, when my friend Pieter and I visited the library of Docheiariou, accompanied by a Greek professor from Thessaloniki, who explained us everything about the very old books we were allowed to hold in our hands and look though it. Most of the parchment books were eaten by bookworms and had holes in it........ The professor put the books on microfilm."
book: Akolouthia 1901
(notice the dolphin and anchor- this is the symbol of the Aldine Press, a famous Renaissance printer. Erasmus, yes the Erasmus, even lived with them for a time)
Check the link below for more beautiful pictures!
via athos.web-log.nl
Those who objected to the Christian gospel ridiculed it, mocking it because of its absurdity. For there is nothing more ridiculous than the word of someone who preaches that the Son of God was born and brought up by Jews, who rejects neither the cross nor death, who says moreover not only that Christ rose from the dead but that he ascended to heaven as Lord of all, that he will raise everyone else from the dead, and other things the apostles preached. The pagans mocked these things and ridiculed them, thinking that they would make the apostles shut up. Therefore Saint Paul, feeling obliged to reply to this opinion of the apostles, began his teaching thus: I am not ashamed of the gospel (Romans 1:16).
-Gennadius of Constantinople (458 – 471), Sermons
Recent Comments